Karnataka High CourtKPSC Chairperson✎ Governor's suspension of KPSC Chairperson was illegal as it lacked State Cabinet's aid and advice.
Relevance for Banking, SSC & RBI Grade B exams: Polity
The Karnataka High Court on August 18, 2026, set aside the suspension of Shivashankarappa S. Sahukar as Chairperson of the Karnataka Public Service Commission (KPSC) by the Governor, ruling that the suspension was legally invalid as it was issued without the aid and advice of the State Cabinet. The court held that the Governor lacked the power to suspend the KPSC chairperson independently, as such action could only be taken after the President of India, acting on the Governor’s recommendation, refers the matter to the Supreme Court under Article 317(1) of the Constitution for an inquiry. The judgment underscores the constitutional safeguards governing the removal of members of State Public Service Commissions, emphasizing the need for procedural compliance and executive accountability in administrative decisions.
This case holds significant relevance for Banking, SSC, and RBI Grade B exam aspirants as it highlights key constitutional provisions related to the functioning of State Public Service Commissions, the role of the Governor, and the importance of adherence to legal procedures in administrative actions. Questions in these exams often test candidates’ understanding of constitutional provisions, separation of powers, and judicial review, making this judgment a pertinent example for topics such as constitutional governance, public service commissions, and the limits of executive authority. Aspirants should note the court’s emphasis on the necessity of cabinet advice for gubernatorial actions, which aligns with broader themes of checks and balances in Indian polity.
Source: The Hindu
Generated by AanyaAi for educational purpose.
