✎ EC's impartiality is crucial for free and fair elections; internal dissent raises concerns about its functioning.
Relevance for Banking, SSC & RBI Grade B exams: Economy/Governance
Samajwadi Party president Akhilesh Yadav on Wednesday accused the Election Commission (EC) of acting unconstitutionally by allowing governments to be formed during a period marked by internal dissent and alleged lapses in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process. Yadav cited a report claiming two Election Commissioners, Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi, had recorded objections 14 times over 10 months to EC decisions, raising concerns about the panel’s impartiality. He argued that such internal dissent undermined the EC’s credibility, calling into question the legitimacy of governments formed during this period and urging the Supreme Court to intervene. Yadav also alleged systematic deletion of SP supporters from electoral rolls, alleging no corrective action was taken despite complaints, further questioning the EC’s fairness in electoral processes.
This controversy holds significant relevance for candidates preparing for banking, SSC, and RBI Grade B exams, as it touches upon constitutional governance, electoral reforms, and institutional accountability—key topics in the economy and polity sections. Questions on the role of constitutional bodies like the EC, electoral reforms, and judicial oversight may appear in exams, testing aspirants’ understanding of governance mechanisms. Additionally, awareness of such current affairs helps in framing answers on democratic principles and the functioning of independent institutions, which are often evaluated in descriptive and analytical sections of these examinations.
Source: Times of India
Generated by AanyaAi for educational purpose.
1 comment on “Akhilesh Yadav Slams EC Over Unconstitutional Govt Formation Claims”