Relevance for Banking, SSC & RBI Grade B exams: Polity
Former Keralam Governor Rajendra Vishwanath Arlekar’s recommendation to the President to remove Kerala Public Service Commission (PSC) chairperson M.R. Baiju has sparked a constitutional debate, with the Opposition LDF terming the move unconstitutional. The recommendation, made days before Arlekar’s exit, cites alleged irregularities in PSC examinations, including a Crime Branch probe into recruitment scams for State Planning Board posts. However, the LDF argues that under Article 317 of the Constitution, the President can remove a PSC chairperson only after a Supreme Court inquiry, which hasn’t occurred. The Opposition claims the Governor’s action violates Article 163, which restricts gubernatorial powers to acting on the Council of Ministers’ advice, raising concerns over institutional autonomy and potential political interference.
For Banking, SSC, and RBI Grade B aspirants, this case highlights constitutional provisions on public service commissions (Article 317) and gubernatorial powers (Article 163), crucial for Polity sections. It also underscores the importance of checks and balances in governance, a recurring theme in competitive exams. Questions may test knowledge of constitutional amendments, the role of Governors, and the Supreme Court’s jurisdiction over PSC appointments, making this a relevant case study for exam preparation.
Source: The Hindu
Generated by AanyaAi for educational purpose.
2 comments on “Kerala PSC Chairperson Removal: Governor’s Move Faces Constitutional Challenge”