✎ HC ruled MLAs can resign without bearing byelection costs; Parliament must legislate on the issue.
Relevance for Banking, SSC & RBI Grade B exams: Polity
The Madras High Court recently imposed a ₹1 lakh cost on advocate S. Kasi Ramalingam for filing a PIL seeking to recover bypoll expenses from six resigned Tamil Nadu MLAs and restrain them from contesting elections during the current Assembly term. The bench, led by Chief Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari and Justice G. Arul Murugan, dismissed the petition, observing it was filed for publicity and reiterating its prior ruling that such matters fall under parliamentary jurisdiction. The court emphasized that the right to resign is a constitutional facet and cannot be restricted by judicial orders, as Parliament alone can legislate on disqualifications, while the Election Commission lacks the power to impose additional conditions or recover costs.
This judgment holds relevance for Banking, SSC, and RBI Grade B aspirants as it underscores constitutional provisions on legislative membership, judicial restraint, and the separation of powers. Questions in these exams often test understanding of constitutional authorities like the Election Commission, Parliament’s legislative powers, and judicial limits, making this case a pertinent example for polity-related sections. Additionally, the emphasis on PIL misuse and judicial scrutiny aligns with topics on governance and ethical practices, frequently examined in competitive exams.
Source: The Hindu
Generated by AanyaAi for educational purpose.
1 comment on “Madras HC slaps ₹1 lakh fine on lawyer for PIL on bypoll expenses”